On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > > If we can find a good way to do it, I think having BF animals > automatically picking up new branches is a very good thing to have. So > don't give up so easily :D If adding a more or less random file to > back branches is the only way to do it, I'm for doing that - I'd just > like to find some method that feels cleaner. But maybe I'm just > bikeshedding for no real use here.
Adding new branches automatically would be great, but it'll need some work from the animal herders as well as some careful design - for example, my Windows animals have separate schedules for each branch (some running more frequently than others), whilst my Solaris ones now use a runner script that cycles through the list of branches on each of a couple of animals. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
