On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's not me you block Robert, I'm not actually a user and I will sleep >> well whatever happens, happy that I tried to resolve this. Users watch >> and remember. > > If you are proposing that I should worry about a posse of angry > PostgreSQL users hunting me down (or abandoning the product) because I > agreed with Tom Lane on the necessity of reverting one of your > patches, then I'm willing to take that chance. For one thing, there's > a pretty good chance they'll go after Tom first. For two things, > there's at least an outside chance I might be rescued by an > alternative posse who supports our tradition of putting out high > quality releases. Not sure where anger and violence entered the discussion, but a posse does sound amusing. If such groups ever met, I'm sure both would support the tradition of high quality, but I suspect they might define it differently and that would be the source of the problem. Much like Life of Brian. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
