On 11-06-23 02:41 AM, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
> I receive this mail, so I notice I do wrong recognition to what
> Heikki is proposing.
>
> my recognition:
> Before:
> * I thought Heikki proposes, "Execute SQL(pg_start_backup('x'); copy
> the data directory and pg_stop_backup();) from the standby server
> to the primary server".
> -> I disliked this.
> Now:
> * Heikki is proposing both No using pg_basebackup and Not specify -x.
> So,
> * Use the output of pg_stop_backup().
> * Don't use backup history file.
> he thinks.
>
> Right?
>
What I think he is proposing would not require using pg_stop_backup()
but you could also modify pg_stop_back() to work as well.
What do you think of this idea?
Do you see how the patch can be reworked to accomplish this?
> --------------------------------------------
> Jun Ishizuka
> NTT Software Corporation
> TEL：045-317-7018
> E-Mail: ishizuka....@po.ntts.co.jp
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
