2011/6/17 Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.han...@gmail.com>: > (2011/06/12 6:43), Noah Misch wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:48:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> Me neither. If making the deadlock timeout PGC_SUSET is independently >>> useful, I don't object to doing that first, and then we can wait and >>> see if anyone feels motivated to do more. >> >> Here's the patch for that. Not much to it. > > I've reviewed the patch following the article in the PostgreSQL wiki. > It seems fine except that it needs to be rebased, so I'll mark this > "Ready for committers'.
OK, committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
