Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm currently on the other end of the spectrum: ignore and > consider for 9.2. I guess part of my point was that if we can't safely get something into the initial 9.1 release, it doesn't mean we necessarily need to wait for 9.2. Bugs can be fixed along the way in minor releases. A 9.1.1 fix might give us more time to work through details and ensure that it is a safe and well-targeted fix. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
