2010/7/12 Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov>: > Pavel Baroš<baro...@seznam.cz> wrote: >> Dne 9.7.2010 21:33, Robert Haas napsal(a): > >>> Please add your patch here, so that it will be reviewed during >>> the about-to-begin CommitFest. >>> >>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open >>> >> >> OK, but will you help me with that form? Do you think I can fill >> it like that? I'm not sure about few fields .. >> >> Name: Snapshot materialized views >> CommitFest Topic: [ Miscellaneous | SQL Features ] ??? > > SQL Features seems reasonable to me. > >> Patch Status: Needs review >> Author: me >> Reviewers: You? > > Leave empty. Reviewers will sign up or be assigned. > >> Commiters: who? > > That comes much later -- when the patch is complete and has a > favorable review, then a committer will pick it up. > >> and I quess fields 'Date Closed' and 'Message-ID for Original >> Patch' will be filled later. > > Date closed is only set for patches which are committed, returned > with feedback (for a later CommitFest), or rejected. When you make > an entry which references a post to the lists, you should fill in > the Message-ID from the email header of the post. You may be able > to get this from your email software as soon as you send the post; > if not, you can find it on the archive page for the post.
This topic hasn't been touched on in nearly a year, but is the work that's been done so far salvageable? I'm not sure what happens to GSoC project work that doesn't get finished in time. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
