2011/6/17, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>: > On 06/17/2011 11:29 AM, Nicolas Barbier wrote: > >> CDATA sections are just syntactic sugar (a form of escaping): > > Yeah. OTOH doesn't an empty CDATA section force a child element, where a > pure empty element does not?
Wow, some Googling around shows that there is much confusion about this. I thought that it was obvious that adding <![CDATA[]]> shouldn't change the content at all, but quite a few people seem to disagree :-/. Nicolas -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
