On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Dan Ports <d...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:49:48PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Does this mean that the open item "more SSI loose ends" can now be >> marked resolved? > > I was just looking at it and contemplating moving it to the non-blockers > list. Of the five items: > - (1) and (4) are resolved > - (2) isn't an issue -- maybe we want to add a comment, someplace but > I'm not convinced even that is necessary > - (3) is a regression test, and is already on the list separately > - (5) is a doc issue only > > There are no open issues with the code that I'm aware of.
Perhaps it would be best to remove the general item and replace it with a list of more specific things that need doing - which might just mean #5. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
