Robert Haas wrote: > > We can pick different options for 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2. ?(For PG 9.0 > > probably only #1 is appropriate.) > > I don't like any of these options as well as what I already proposed. > I proposed a complicated approach that actually fixes the problem for > real; you're proposing a whole bunch of simpler approaches all of > which have pretty obvious holes. We already have something that only > sorta works; replacing it with a different system that only sorta > works is not going to be a great leap forward.
What is your proposal? Write a password into a file that is read by the postmaster on startup and used for connections? That would remove the "modify pg_hba.conf to 'trust'" step, but again only for new servers. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
