Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié jun 15 16:31:45 -0400 2011: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this? > > My understanding was that your patch had a bug, rather than the > existing code. If I misunderstood, please explain the bug.
This is about FOREIGN KEY NOT VALID, which is your patch that's already in 9.1. My patch doesn't touch foreign keys. CHECK constraints cannot be deferrable anyway. > In terms of "2ndQuadrant" supplying patches, you may not be aware that > we all work independently on community contributions... I wasn't, but that doesn't change anything -- I mean, you were from 2nd Quadrant last time I checked. If Jaime is going to submit a patch to fix the bug, I assume you're fine with that too? (The other alternative is to leave the bug open until Robert or Tom fix it, I guess) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
