Bear Giles wrote: > > Sorry, there is a newer version. I will use that one. > > You may want to hold off on that - I've been busy lately and haven't had > a chance to revisit the documentation or change some of the literal constants > to numeric constants, but it's been on my "to do" list.
OK, thanks. I will hold off on the docs part. Sorry it has taken me so long to get to these SSL patches (my vacation). I am doing them now. > The latter didn't affect the other patches since I planned on doing a > latter-day patch anyway, but the documentation may need some big changes > to emphasize that the rule that it's "use SSH tunnels if you just want > to prevent eavesdropping, use SSL directly if you need to firmly establish > the identity of the server or clients." > > (And sorry about responding via the lists, but your mail server doesn't > like to talk to cable modem users.) Sorry about the block. RBL+ has been much more effective lately, and it is because they are blocking more dialup users. This the first false positive I have gotten from them. You can use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or route your email through west.navpoint.com. I will see if I can pass your IP through. I can do it in my blacklist, but I am not sure that works for RBL+. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
