On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:43:58PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > Do checks such as that argue for keeping the volatile flag, or do > > you think we can drop it if we make those changes? (That would also > > allow dropping a number of casts which exist just to avoid > > warnings.) > > I believe we can drop it, I'll double-check.
Yes, dropping it seems like the thing to do. It's been on my list for a while. We are not really getting anything out of declaring it volatile since we cast the volatile qualifier away most of the time. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
