"Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, keeping the setval is appropriate. Are there any problems with a > SERIAL(<sequence name>) implementation?
What for? The sequence name is an implementation detail, not something
we want to expose (much less let users modify).
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
