Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:42 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: >> Can Pg be changed to support "." in operator names as long as they don't >> just >> appear by themselves? What would this break to do so?
> Someone else would have to comment on that. DOT_DOT is already a token in plpgsql; trying to make it be also an operator name would break a lot of existing plpgsql code. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers