Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
>> If we're going to start putting in changes like this, I'd suggest that
>> we try and target something like September for 9.1 to actually be
>> released. Â Playing with the lock management isn't something we want to
>> be doing lightly and I think we definitely need to have serious testing
>> of this, similar to what has been done for the SSI changes, before we're
>> going to be able to release it.
> Completely aside from the issue at hand, aren't we looking at a
> September release by now anyway (assuming we have to void late
> July/August as we usually do)?
Very possibly. So if we add this in, we're talking November or December
instead of September. You can't argue that July/August will be lost
time for one development path but not another.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
