Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of sáb jun 04 09:11:52 -0400 2011: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Actually, it turns out that NOT VALID foreign keys were already buggy > > here, and fixing them automatically fixes this case as well, because the > > fix involves touching pg_get_constraintdef to dump the flag. This also > > gets it into psql's \d. Patch attached. > > > > (Maybe the changes in psql's describe.c should be reverted, not sure.) > > Thanks. As soon as Thom said that, I thought "ahh... didn't do that". > > Patch looks fine. Will you commit this patch to 9.1 now, or would you > like me to? Thanks for the review. I already committed it on 9.1: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=048417511aef8d5fb2d541b17b73afc730935cd5 I'd still like your opinion on the psql bits. Should they be reverted? I haven't verified what the output currently looks like. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
