On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Chernow <a...@esilo.com> wrote:
> On 6/3/2011 10:26 PM, Andrew Chernow wrote:
>>
>>>> I disagree -- I think the fix is a one-liner. line 446:
>>>> if (tup_num == res->ntups&& !res->tuples[tup_num])
>>>>
>>>> should just become
>>>> if (tup_num == res->ntups)
>>>>
>>>> also the memset of the tuple slots when the slot array is expanded can
>>>> be removed. (in addition, the array tuple array expansion should
>>>> really be abstracted, but that isn't strictly necessary here).
>>>>
>>>
>>> All true. This is a cleaner fix to something that was in fact broken ;)
>>> You want
>>
>> Attached a patch that fixes the OP's issue. PQsetvalue now uses pqAddTuple
>> to
>> grow the tuple table and has removed the remnants of an older idea that
>> caused
>> the bug.
>>
>
> Sorry, I attached the wrong patch.  Here is the correct one.


This looks good.  Pavel, want to test it?

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to