Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> writes:
> On Jun1, 2011, at 20:28 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Well, initdb still succeeds if you give it an invalid locale name. It
>> warns, but that can easily be missed if initdb is hidden behind a few
>> other layers. If you then run pg_upgrade, you get a hosed instance.
> Whats the rational behind that behaviour? Wouldn't it be more user-friendly
> if initdb failed outright? It'd also be consistent with CREATE DATABASE...
I think we were being conservative about whether initdb would get it
right. Might be time to stiffen our spines a bit, now that the logic
has been through a few release cycles.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
