On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> The whole point of the revamp was that pg_listener was a major performance
> bottleneck and needed to go, and without it being gone we would not have got
> notification payloads.

Yeah, I know why it was replaced. That doesn't mean we cannot provide
an alternative interface to the same info though (other things might
of course).

> I suspect you're pretty much out of luck.

Not me - our users.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to