On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > The whole point of the revamp was that pg_listener was a major performance > bottleneck and needed to go, and without it being gone we would not have got > notification payloads.
Yeah, I know why it was replaced. That doesn't mean we cannot provide an alternative interface to the same info though (other things might of course). > I suspect you're pretty much out of luck. Not me - our users. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers