Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just committed changes which implement three SQL99 functions and
> operators.

I'm getting

gcc -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -I../../../../src/include 
  -c -o regexp.o regexp.c
regexp.c: In function `textregexsubstr':
regexp.c:314: warning: unused variable `result'

The code seems to be rather undecided about whether it intends to return
NULL or an empty string --- would you make up your mind and remove the
other case entirely?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to