Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> 1. If a domain type is passed to an ANYARRAY argument, automatically >> downcast it to its base type (which of course had better then be an >> array).
> Does that mean that plpgsql %type variable declarations will see the > base type (and miss any constraint checks?). No, this has nothing to do with %type. What's at stake is matching to functions/operators that are declared to take ANYARRAY. > #2a seems cleaner to me (superficially). Got an example of a behavior > you think is changed? See my response to David Wheeler. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers