On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:25, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Some of my personal discussions of this topic have suggested that some other >> popular extensions like pgcrypto and hstore get converted too. I think >> those all fail test (3), and I'm not actually sure where pgcrypto adds any >> special dependency/distribution issues were it to be moved to the main >> database package. If this general idea catches on, a wider discussion of >> what else should get "promoted" to this extensions area would be >> appropriate. The ones I picked seemed the easiest to justify by this >> criteria set. > > pgcrypto would cause trouble for any builds *without* SSL. I don't > think any packagers do that, but people doing manual builds would > certainly get different results.
What kind of trouble? It should work fine without SSL. -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
