Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I use pgstattuple, pageinspect, pg_freespacemap, and pg_buffercache
>> regularly enough that I wish they were more common. Throw in pgrowlocks and
>> you've got the whole group Robert put into the debug set. It makes me sad
>> every time I finish a utility using one of these and realize I'll have to
>> include the whole "make sure you have the contrib modules installed"
>> disclaimer in its documentation again.
> Well the lightweight way to achieve what you want is to just move
> these functions into core.
I'm completely not in favor of that. We have spent man-years upon
man-years on making Postgres an extensible system. If we can't actually
*use* the extension features then that was all a waste of effort.
If anything I'd rather see us looking at what parts of the current core
system could be pushed out to extensions. The geometric types are a
pretty obvious candidate, for example.
> The only argument I see as particularly frightening on that front is
> people playing the sekurity card.
Yeah, and it's a reasonable argument. Even if it's not a reasonable
argument, you won't win any friends from the other side of the fence
by taking away their ability to choose.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
