On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > In my opinion this is actually a bug in < 9.0. As its a (imo) low impact fix > thats constrained to two files it seems sensible to backpatch it now that the > solution has proven itself in the field? > > The issue is hard to find and has come up several times in the field. And it > has > been slightly embarassing more than once ;)
Can you share some more details about your experiences? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
