Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > Here is the patch to fix that, as discussed.
Looks sane --- I assume you tested it against the originally complained-of scenario? http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] If so, please apply soon --- we need to wrap beta1 this evening. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
