Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 4/21/11 3:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we should think about the SP controlling a second backend (or even
>> multiple backends?) that's executing the "transactional" operations.
>> dblink on steroids, as it were.
> This is how people are doing this now (using dblink I mean).
Right, and it works. But it's notationally painful, management of the
connection information poses security issues, etc etc. Perhaps those
sorts of things could be addressed, though.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
