Hi Peter 2011/4/21 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: > So the topic of "real" "stored procedures" came up again. Meaning a > function-like object that executes outside of a regular transaction, > with the ability to start and stop SQL transactions itself. > > I would like to collect some specs on this feature. So does anyone have > links to documentation of existing implementations, or their own spec > writeup? A lot of people appear to have a very clear idea of this > concept in their own head, so let's start collecting those. >
I had a patch for "transactional" procedures, but this is lost :( http://okbob.blogspot.com/2007/11/stacked-recordset-multirecordset.html What I (We) expect: Very important points: 1. possible explicit transaction controlling - not only subtransactions 2. correct or usual behave of OUT parameters (important for JDBC people) *** attention: overloading is related to OUT parameters too *** Not necessary but nice: 3. Support for multirecordset and RETURN_STATUS variable (RETURN_STATUS is defined by ANSI) Regards Pavel > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
