Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what is useful to be learned from that > specific work. But it does suggest two things: one, this is far > from an easy thing to fix. Two, the only reason MySQL does so > well on it is because there was some focused work on it, taking a > quite a while to accomplish, and involving many people. Doing > better for PostgreSQL is something I see as more of a long-term > goal, rather than something it would be reasonable to expect quick > progress on. Nice research. Thanks for putting that in front of people. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
