On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > Seeing that 9.1-to-9.1 pg_upgrade has apparently been broken for months, > it would probably be good to have some kind of automatic testing for it. > Attached is something I hacked together that at least exposes the > current problems, easily available by typing "make check" and waiting. > It does not yet fully implement the full testing procedure in the > TESTING file, in particular the diffing of the dumps (well, because you > can't get there yet). > > Is that something that people are interested in refining? > > (I think it would even be possible under this setup to create special > regression test cases that are only run under the pg_upgrade test run, > to exercise particularly tricky upgrade cases.)
I think it's a worthwhile thing to do, but right now I think it would be more helpful if you could help fix the breakage your patch created, rather than working on new stuff. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
