On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06:30AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > The only thing I've been on the fence about is whether it > makes more sense to allocate it all up front or to continue to allow > incremental allocation but set a hard limit on the number of entries > allocated for each shared memory HTAB. Is there a performance- > related reason to choose one path or the other?
Seems like it would be marginally better to allocate it up front -- then you don't have the cost of having to split buckets later as it grows. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
