Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway? Just assume > that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just > work. > > We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.
+1 I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider. This and removing module_pathname in the control files to just use $libdir/contrib in the .sql files. That would set a better example to people who want to make their own extensions, as the general case is that those will not get into contrib. I think we should lower the differences between contrib and external extensions, so that contrib is only about who maintains the code and distribute the extension. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
