hubert depesz lubaczewski <dep...@depesz.com> wrote: > it worked. now the slave2 is working as stand alone. > > what does it tell us? will any work happening after checkpoint > break it anyway? I'm less sure about what will put it into a bad state again than I was that an immediate checkpoint would put you into a good state. I have a vague feeling that I've seen or heard something which suggests that doing this during a spread checkpoint might be a problem as things currently stand. I can't be more specific without digging through code, and I'm pretty swamped at the moment. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
