On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > >> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning >> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its >> max_size when it was created. > > I think this does it. > > If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the > SSI patch. Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should > I add it to the first 9.2 CF?
I don't think it's too late to commit something like this, but I'm not clear on whether we want it. Is this checking for what should be a can't-happen case, or are these soft limits that we expect to be exceeded from time to time? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
