Simon Riggs wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> At least as I understand it, it's not our project policy to carry >> around code that doesn't accomplish anything useful. I have no >> objection to keeping the field; I simply think that if we're >> going to have it, we should make it work > What a stupid conversation. That hardly seems like a convincing response. Adding a column to a view when the column contains meaninful values seems less likely to break things than initially adding it with a different value, identical to another column, and then changing the semantics. +1 for either dropping it or making it work. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
