On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011: >> >> > > At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and >> > > -X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions >> > > (unless you want to count alphas). But considering that this has been >> > > deprecated and undocumented since 8.2, I think it might be time to >> > > pull the plug on -X altogether. >> > >> > I remove the new -X options with the attached, applied patch. The >> > existing options are not really costing us anything except a few lines >> > of code. >> >> Given that, it seems pretty pointless to remove support for -X options >> that have existed for years. > > I agree. They are not documented and only are a few C lines.
Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
