----- Original message ----- > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On tis, 2011-02-08 at 00:32 -0500, Steve Singer wrote: > > > The documentation could probably still use more word-smithing but > > > that can happen later. I'm marking this as ready for a committer. > > > > Is it necessarily a good idea that an explicit subtransaction disables > > the implicit sub-subtransactions? It might be conceivable that you'd > > still want to do some try/catch within explicit subtransactions. > > Is this still an open question, or what is the remaining issue that > needs to be addressed with regards to this patch?
The docs are included in the latest patch, and it turned out that disabling implicit subxacts inside explicit subxacts is not a good idea, so it's been fixed in the last patch. There are no unresolved issues AFAICT. Jan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
