On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:35:30AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > > >> The best idea I have at the moment is to spell out "data modifying > >> command" (or "statement") rather than relying on the acronym. > >> In the code, we could change hasDmlWith to hasModifyingWith, for > >> example. The error messages could read like > >> data-modifying statement in WITH is not allowed in a view > >> > >> Comments? > > > > Great idea. I had the same complaint when I looked at this patch > > a year ago, but didn't come up with nearly as good an idea as to > > what to do about it. > > I like "statement" better than "command," too, but love the acronym > DMC. As in, "you want to Run [a] DMC." ;-P
Hit it, Run! ;) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
