On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 14:54:02 -0300 2011: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > 16. synchronized snapshots. Alvaro is working on this one. >> >> Lots of discussion of this one, but current status is not clear to me. >> Alvaro, are you working on this actively? > > I am. I'm not sure if it's still reasonable to get into 9.1, given that > it needs to be rewritten from almost completely from scratch.
Well, if it gets punted, I won't be too sad, since the pg_dump patch to actually use this functionality for something useful already got pushed off. If you can commit something in a timely fashion that is also high quality, great, but if not, I don't see it as a show-stopper. The highest priorities IMO are writeable CTEs and synchronous replication. I doubt that there would be majority support for prolonging this on the basis of any other single patch, though I might be wrong about that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
