On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't >>> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world. > >> The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that >> send the text representation also. Would that be better? > > It'd be more future-proof than this patch, but I'm still unconvinced > about the use-case.
Do we want to intentionally make binary format a second-class citizen? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
