On 19/02/11 11:30, Josh Berkus wrote:
No worries and sorry, I should have used the "per backend" phrase in the title to help clarify what was intended.Yeah, the disadvantage is that (like statement timeout) it is a 'bottom of the cliff' type of protection. The advantage is there are no false positives...Yeah, just trying to get a handle on the proposed feature. I have no objections; it seems like a harmless limit for most people, and useful to a few.
Cheers Mark
