Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> It's not running HS, so there's no query to wait on.
> That seems to imply that recovery has leaked a buffer pin.
No, because then the sanity check in LockBufferForCleanup would have
fired:
/* There should be exactly one local pin */
if (PrivateRefCount[buffer - 1] != 1)
elog(ERROR, "incorrect local pin count: %d",
PrivateRefCount[buffer - 1]);
Some sort of deadly embrace with the bgwriter, maybe?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
