On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 16.02.2011 19:29, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> Actually, on further reflection, I'm not even sure why we bother with >> the fsync. It seems like a useful safeguard but I'm not seeing how we >> can get to that point without having fsync'd everything anyway. Am I >> missing something? > > WalRcvDie() is called on error. For example, if the connection dies > unexpectedly during walrcv_receive().
Ah, OK. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
