Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't see any reason that the old version of the function couldn't be
>> dropped in the upgrade script. It's not likely anything would be
>> depending on it, is it?
> I don't see much point in taking the risk.
What risk? And at least we'd be trying to do it cleanly, in a manner
that should work for at least 99% of users. AFAICT, Heikki's proposal
is "break it for everyone, and damn the torpedoes".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
