On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > I have to say that I've always been a bit suprised by the idea that the > CommitFest is intended to be done and all patches *committed* at the end > of the month. It's been working really rather well, which is due in > great part to the excellent CF managers (thanks again for being that, > again). That said, we have quite a few non-committer reviewers who > provide good feedback and move the patch back to 'waiting for author' > and that whole process takes a while.
> > Perhaps a thought for next time would be to offset things a bit. eg: > > CF 2011-03 (or whatever): > 2011-02-14: Patches should all be submitted > 2011-02-14: Reviewers start > 2011-03-01: Committers start w/ 'Ready for Committer' patches > 2011-03-14: Patches not marked 'Ready for Committer' get bounced > 2011-03-31: All patches committed > > I'm not against the 'waiting on author' approach, but I do feel like if > we're going to continue to have it, we need to spread it out a bit more. > I do think this would place more work on the CF manager, unfortunately, > but I'd hope that they would primairly be focused on managing the > reviews and not be as busy during the last 2 weeks. Maybe one day I'll > be brave enough to offer to manage one and see. :) > > Thanks again, Robert, you've done an excellent job managing the CF. > > Stephen > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZXTQACgkQrzgMPqB3kiiLAQCfUVusKmhcQW1KNGQwZSFpdONx > G4oAnjzPLSQpyaounlTMrumdoQe58yA/ > =zuCX > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
