On 11-02-12 05:58 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
On 11/02/11 10:53, Jan Urbański wrote:
On 10/02/11 22:26, Steve Singer wrote:
Here's an updated patch with documentation. It's an incremental patch on
top of the latest explicit-subxacts version.


This looks fine. I've attached a one word documentation change to go o top of the patch.

I'll let Peter decide if he likes those assert's or not. I don't have a good enough sense of if we often use asserts in that fashion elsewhere.



Cheers,
Jan




diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml
index aee54bf..4a90430 100644
*** a/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml
*************** $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
*** 966,972 ****
  </programlisting>
     </para>
     <para>
!     The actual class of the exception being raised corresponds to exact
      condition that caused the error (refer to <xref linkend="errcodes-table">
      for a list of possible conditions).  The
      <literal>plpy.spiexceptions</literal> module defines an exception class for
--- 966,972 ----
  </programlisting>
     </para>
     <para>
!     The actual class of the exception being raised corresponds to the exact
      condition that caused the error (refer to <xref linkend="errcodes-table">
      for a list of possible conditions).  The
      <literal>plpy.spiexceptions</literal> module defines an exception class for
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to