Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > > >>> I have reviewed is_absolute_path() and have implemented
> > > >>> path_is_relative_and_below_cwd() to cleanly handle cases like 'E:abc' 
> > > >>> on
> > > >>> Win32;  patch attached.
> > > >> 
> > > >> This patch appears to remove some security-critical restrictions.
> > > >> Why did you delete the path_contains_parent_reference calls?
> > > 
> > > > They are now in path_is_relative_and_below_cwd(),
> > > 
> > > ... and thus not invoked in the absolute-path case.  This is a security
> > > hole.
> > > 
> > > >  I don't see a general reason to prevent
> > > > ".." in absolute paths, only relative ones.
> > > 
> > >   load '/path/to/database/../../../path/to/anywhere'
> > 
> > Ah, good point. I was thinking about someone using ".." in the part of
> > the path that is compared to /data or /log, but using it after that
> > would clearly be a security problem.
> > 
> > I have attached an updated patch that restructures the code to be
> > clearer and adds the needed checks.
> 
> I decided that my convert_and_check_filename() usage was too intertwined
> so I have developed a simplified version that is easier to understand; 
> patch attached.

Applied, with a new mention of why we don't use GetFullPathName():

+   /*
+    *  On Win32, a drive letter _not_ followed by a slash, e.g. 'E:abc', is
+    *  relative to the cwd on that drive, or the drive's root directory
+    *  if that drive has no cwd.  Because the path itself cannot tell us
+    *  which is the case, we have to assume the worst, i.e. that it is not
+    *  below the cwd.  We could use GetFullPathName() to find the full path
+    *  but that could change if the current directory for the drive changes
+    *  underneath us, so we just disallow it.
+    */

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to