On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes: >> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >>> Hmm. To make that work, we'd have to have ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE use a >>> different default version name from what CREATE EXTENSION uses (unless > >> Yes. I see that as a good feature to have. stable and support looks >> like good default aliases for me, but again, IANANS (native speaker). > > I'm not very happy with that at all, either as to the concept or the > specific version-alias names. I don't think that CREATE and ALTER > really need different default version targets. And those choices of > names carry far too much baggage. "Default" is what they are as far as > the system is concerned, but names like those imply a lot more. > > Anybody else have an opinion on this detail?
I agree with you. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
