On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > So what you're suggesting is that the plpgsql code is causing the issues? > Are there any indications about how I could re-write this code? The > important thing for me is to have the aforementioned signature of the > plpgsql function with one UDT OUT parameter. Even if this is a bit awkward > in general, in this case, I don't mind rewriting the plpgsql function > content to create a workaround for this problem...
Possibly something like address := (SELECT ...) rather than SELECT ... INTO address? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
