Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Well, the difference is that loose objects are just on my system, > whereas extensions are supposed to work on anybody's system. I'm not > clear that it's possible to write an extension that depends on a > relocatable extension in a sensible way. If it is, objection > withdrawn.
I proposed that in this case, we bypass the relocatable property and just have the system work out that reverse dependencies make all those extensions not relocatable. Tom said that he does not see the point in trying to limit this foot gun power. -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
