On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: > > > > + else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME) > > + snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), > > + "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point % > s\n", > > + (srcfd < 0) ? "" : "\n", > > + parentTLI, > > + xlogfname, > > + recoveryStopAfter ? "after" : > "before", > > + recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint); > > > > It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point. > After/Before > > only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time. > Removed. > > > > you're right
Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time." Why? At present, I think the ability to stop before/after a named restore point should be put back. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
